Saturday, June 12, 2010
So much rubbish on LTE/WiMAX in Media
Sample 1: Economic Times
LTE is a technology patented by Qualcomm, like CDMA for cellular telephony which is what Reliance chose when it started services under Mukesh Ambani. Reliance Communications has since launched parallel services in GSM.
Using this technology the company will needs to deploy fewer base stations, or points from which wireless signal is emitted because a single point covers 50 km on an average. “RIL will save on both tower leasing costs and electronic equipment cost,” said a regional telecom head at an international research firm.
Sample 2: Business Standard
LTE would have faster data speeds as compared to WiMax. Besides, voice services can also be launched through LTE and it would have a wider coverage area.
Sample 3: Business Standard
As BWA spectrum ensures higher speeds, it can support even voice calls. The high bids indicate broadband is not the only objective. “The bidding is being done for the spectrum as a whole, with just a BWA business plan now,” said Mrityunjay Kapoor, country head, Protiviti India. Experts also believe that using BWA spectrum for voice can lead to more efficient use of the spectrum.
This is just a small sample and such nuggets of information are spread all across the news pages. Is this down to lazy journalism or do we have a shortage of real experts on wireless technologies?
Sunday, September 13, 2009
3G and BWA Auctions Timeline
Pre-qualification of Bidders 27-Nov-09
Mock Auction 03-Dec-09 to 04-Dec-09
Start of the 3G-WCDMA Auction 07-Dec-09
The EVDO and BWA spectrum auctions will start 2 days after the close of the 3G auction.
If the DoT sticks to this schedule, then the auction process will be completed before the end of this year. Actual rollout of services will take at least another 6 months.
The state-owned companies, BSNL and MTNL already have 3G and BWA spectrum and have been offering services for the past few months. They have not met with much success in acquiring a significant customer base, despite having the first-mover advantage. It is widely believed that the entry of private operators will really kick-start the rollout of 3G and BWA services across the country.
It is interesting to note that the BWA spectrum is mostly unpaired which means that only TDD technologies can be deployed. This will favor WiMAX in the short-run, at least.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Price of 3G and BWA spectrum
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Re-defining Broadband?
It's debatable whether re-defining broadband service characteristics can increase penetration. If the TRAI and DoT are really serious about achieving government targets, then a better idea would be to expedite spectrum auctions for 3G and BWA services. Both HSPA and WiMAX are very much capable for providing wireless broadband access to a large part of the country, especially where it's difficult to provide DSL and cable.
I have the feeling that we are going back in time as far as wireless technologies are concerned. Just like the CDMA vs GSM war a few years back, the government is again getting caught up in the war between HSPA/LTE and WiMAX proponents. What really matters is that India gets access to broadband services just like everyone else does in other countries. What technology/technologies are used to do so should be left to the market.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
EGoM for 3G
Monday, May 25, 2009
New Government, New Hopes
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
It's Official: 3G Auction Postponed
Last date for applications: 15/01/09
Publication of ownership details: 16/01/09 (19/01/09)
Bidder ownership compliance certificate: 20/01/09 (21/01/09)
Pre-qualification of bidders: 22/01/09
Mock auction: 27-28/01/09
Start of 3G auction: 30/01/09
Start of BWA auction: 2 days after the end of 3G auction
Note that the dates in brackets are for BWA only.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
More Questions about DoT's 3G/BWA Policy
This clearly has implications for both impending deployments as well as any future auctions in the 2.5 GHz band. In particular, BSNL wants to use the paired 2x10 MHz spectrum in FDD mode. It means that another operator who gets BWA spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band in any Gujarat/Maharashtra/AP will either have to use FDD as well or risk a high degree of interference in case it uses the spectrum in TDD mode. Quite expectedly, objections are already being raised.
Another cause for confusion is the policy regarding new 3G operators. DoT is allowing entities that currently do not have a UAS license to bid for 3G spectrum and the license will be awarded to them, in case they are successful in the auction. In the past, UAS licensees have been considered automatically entitled to 4.4 Mhz of GSM spectrum (or 2.5 MHz of CDMA spectrum). It's not clear whether the same rule will be followed in this case. TRAI has asked for more clarity regarding this.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Need for More Clarity on 3G and BWA services
"3G systems represent the next step in the evolution of mobile cellular communication. 2G systems focus on voice communication, while 3G systems support increased data communication. They allow high speed data transfer of at least 144 kbps, mobile Internet access, entertainment, and triple-play converged communications services, and have markedly greater capacity and spectrum efficiency than 2G systems."
"BWA technologies enable high-speed data communication over wireless links. BWA may offer significant advantages over wireline broadband systems based on cable network or DSL in terms of better coverage, speedy deployment, high scalability, lower maintenance and upgrade costs, and phased investment to match market growth."
It is clear that EVDO, UMTS, HSPA, LTE meet 3G service definition and can operate in 2.1 GHz band. In other words, CDMA operator can bid for 3G spectrum in the 2.1 GHz band and use it to deploy EVDO. At the same time, all of the aforementioned technologies plus WiMAX also fulfil BWA service requirements. Since the proposed BWA spectrum is unpaired, UMTS-FDD, HSPA and EVDO are automatically ruled out but it's still possible to deploye UMTS-TDD in the 2.5 GHz band.
This lack of clarity on what consitutes 3G and BWA can potentially lead to contoversy before and after the auctions.
Monday, December 15, 2008
3G Watch
3G spectrum is to be auctioned in the 2.1 GHz band. The amount varies from circle to circle due to limited availability. 4 blocks (2x5 MHz each) will be auctioned in Mumbai and Kolkata whereas Delhi will have only 2 blocks. UP (West) and HP have only 3 blocks available whereas only 2 blocks will be auctioned in Gujarat. A single block is available in West Bengal but there is no 3G spectrum right now in Rajasthan and North-East circles. Rest of the circles have 4 blocks each. Note that these numbers exclude the spectrum already allocated to BSNL and MTNL (1 block each in their respective service areas).
In case of BWA, each service has 3 blocks (20 MHz each) up for auction. MTNL and BSNL have already been allocated BWA spectrum. Of the 4 blocks per circle for BWA, 2 are in 2.3 GHz band and 2 in the 2.5 GHz band. Since unpaired spectrum is being made available for BWA, it is obvious that only TDD-mode deployments will be possible.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Impact of mobile number portability
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
3G Watch
In a related development, the CDMA Development Group (CDG) announced that it's holding discussions with the Indian Govt. for releasing spectrum for EVDO services in the 450 MHz band. As per the current plan, CDMA operators are expected to get 3G spectrum in the 800 MHz band only.
Finally, there is speculation that the roll-out norms for new operators might be relaxed.
Friday, September 12, 2008
DoT Amends 3G and BWA Policy
With regards to 3G, the eligibility criteria has been strengthened by stipulating that a non-UASL entity aiming to bid for spectrum must have prior experience in running 3G services. Spectrum for EVDO will also be allocated via auctions thus reversing the earlier position of giving spectrum to CDMA operators based on subscriber criteria. The reserve price for 2x1.25 MHz in 800 MHz band has been set at 25% of the 3G reserve price (following the pro-rata calculation). Finally, the annual spectrum fee will not be calculated on the incremental revenue earner from 3G services. This is going to be a tricky one, separating revenue earned from 2G and 3G services. The formula for determining the incremental revenue will be specified later.
As for BWA services, CMTS licence holders are now also eligible to bid for spectrum. The spectrum in 2.3 and 2.5 GHz band will be allocated for TDD mode only. The reserve price has now been doubled, such that it becomes 50% of the 3G base price (for a paired 2x5 MHz block). The roll-out conditions have also been changed. Now, 90% of a metro service area must be covered within 5 years and 50% of rural SDCAs must be covered in Category A, B and C areas during the same period.
The full set of amendments are available on the DoT website.
Thursday, August 7, 2008
DoT Guidelines for 3G and BWA Spectrum
3G spectrum is to be auctioned per service area in the form of 2x5 MHz blocks, with 5 to 10 such blocks in each service area, depending on availability. Each operator can bid for only one block in a specific service area. CDMA operators can apply for 2x1.25 MHz in 800 MHz and allocations will be made (subject to availability) on the basis of subscriber base in the service area. The price will be equivalent (on a pro-rata basis) to that paid for a 2x5 MHz block by the highest bidder in 2.1 GHz band. The reserve price has been set as follows:
- Mumbai, Delhi and Category A – Rs 160 Crore
- Kolkata, Chennai and Category B – Rs 80 Crore
- Category C – Rs 30 Crore
Note that DoT has not explicitly ruled out trading and/or sharing of spectrum. As per the guidelines, these, if allowed, will be subject to Government policy. This is in contrast to the guidelines issued earlier in February which clearly stated that “no trading/ reselling of spectrum is allowed”.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
3G Guidelines Coming Soon ?
Friday, June 13, 2008
TRAI Consultation on Allocation and Pricing of BWA Spectrum
The recent consultation paper from the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on “Allocation and Pricing of Spectrum in 2.3-2.4 GHz, 2.5-2.69 GHz and 3.3-3.6 GHz bands” drew more than 30 responses from various stakeholders.
Opinions were sharply divided on the issue of reserve price for 3.3 GHz band. Many respondents (Reliance, Sify, Ortel, WiMAX Forum, Intel, and Telsima) opposed linking the pricing of 3G and BWA spectrum because of differences in range of services and potential returns. However, some (Nokia, Qualcomm, Ericsson, ComFirst and COAI) wanted the same reserve price for all the bands (including 2.1 GHz assigned for 3G) arguing that the same set of services can be provided in all the bands.
For auctioning 3.3 GHz spectrum, the earlier TRAI recommendation was acceptable to most although some (ISPAI, Sify, Spectranet, Ortel and Reliance) opposed auctions because of fears that it will inflate the price. The ISPs favoured allocation based on first-come-first-serve approach with priority to existing licensees while Reliance suggested using the ‘Beauty Parade’ option. BSNL wants to be exempted from paying entry and license fees. Zee Networks and BPL Mobile felt that the reserve price should be increased as the current figure is too low. For the reserve price of the 2.3 GHz and 2.5 GHz bands, three options were suggested:
1. Same as 3.3 GHz band (Reliance, AUSPI, WiMAX Forum)
2. Same as 2.1 GHz band (BPL, COAI, Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm)
3. Determined via market-discovery mechanisms (Aircel, Tata Teleservices, Tata Communications, Intel, WiMAX Forum, Zee Network)
A majority of respondents wanted only existing UASL holders and Category A ISPs to be eligible for BWA spectrum in 2.3 GHz and 2.5 GHz bands but some (BPL Mobile, Tata Communications, Ortel Communications) wanted Category B ISPs to be included as well. On the other hand, COAI wanted only UASL operators to be eligible while Tata Teleservices suggested that UASL operators have priority in spectrum allocation. In contrast, Zee Networks proposed that cellular operators should be excluded and MSOs and broadcasters included. The ISPs (and ISPAI) felt that they should be allowed to retain spectrum currently allocated to them in 2.5 GHz and/or 3.3 GHz bands and also get priority in getting additional spectrum in these bands.
The suggested size of spectrum blocks for auction ranged from 5-20 MHz. Similarly, suggestions for minimum and maximum amount of spectrum holding varied quite a bit although there was consensus on the need for allocating spectrum in contiguous blocks. 30-40 MHz was deemed sufficient in the ideal case by most while 15-20 MHz appeared to be acceptable in case only limited amount is to be auctioned initially. Suggestions for upper limit on cumulative spectrum held by a licensee across the three bands (2.3 GHz, 2.5 GHz and 3.3 GHz) ranged from 20 to 45 MHz.
For allocations in the 2.5 GHz band, most respondents favoured the technology neutral approach, allowing both TDD and FDD systems, as per international best practices and related ITU recommendations. However, some (Reliance, AUSPI, Telsima) suggested allocation for TDD only, if limited amount of spectrum is available initially.
Divergent views were expressed on the question of future refarming spectrum in 2.5 GHz band if initial allocations are for TDD only. A few (BSNL, Telsima) felt that it is feasible from both technical and economic perspectives to refarm spectrum at a later date but others wanted to rule it out on various grounds:
· Technical and/or economic infeasibility (BPL Mobile, Reliance, COAI, Ericsson, Nokia)
· Not required as TDD only is not ruled out by the ITU band plans (Tata Communications, WiMAX Forum, Intel)
· Not possible due to license conditions, viz validity period (Tata Teleservices)
· Improve investor confidence by avoiding uncertainty (Cisco, Nokia)
The response of TV broadcasters, satellite services providers and cable operators was limited to the use of 3.3 GHz band for BWA services and they strongly opposed it for fear of disruption to their operations
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Spectrum Saga Goes On
In the meanwhile, TRAI recently launched a consultation paper on allocation and pricing of spectrum in 2.3-2.4, 2.5-2.6 and 3.4-3.6 GHz bands. Judging from the responses of the different stakeholders, the two hot topics were pricing of BWA spectrum and the co-existence of TDD and FDD systems in the 2.6 GHz band. Most respondents want differential pricing (vis-a-vis 3G and BWA spectrum) to be used, by setting the base price for auction of BWA spectrum much lower than that for 3G spectrum. On the question of TDD-FDD co-existence, a majority of respondents favor the idea and have quoted studies done by the UK regulator Ofcom as well as its guidelines for allocating spectrum in 2.6 GHz band in support. However, there is a significant difference between the Indian and British scenarios as in the case of UK, a total of 190 MHz is on offer whereas in India, it's unlikely that there will be more than 40-50 MHz available in the 2.6 GHz band in the near future.